"Charlie's Angels";
The main problem with the painting is that it tries to be too modern, too careful and attractive. While the protagonists resolutely wring the hands of everyone who demands obedience and a sweet smile from them, the director is deathly afraid of offending someone. On the one hand, it can be understood - today it is difficult to watch McGee's "Charlie's Angels" but not blush from all the racist, sexist, homophobic and just stupid jokes that are crammed into the tape. Banks' painting is unlikely to provoke such a reaction from future generations of viewers - it only ridicules stereotypes, unfair wages and the fashion for esoteric medicine. On the other hand, sometimes the new "Angels" look too innocent and bloodless. There are good action scenes, funny dialogues, and successful characters, but there is a lack of a clear visual style that would not be reduced to too straightforward symbolism.
The story is too predictable to really capture or surprise - the heroines dress up in extravagant clothes, travel at lightning speed through the beautiful corners of Europe (Hamburg! Istanbul! London!), stubbornly fighting pagans, driving expensive cars and solving a mystery that is constantly becoming even more confusing. But there's enough chemistry between them to make it really fun to watch. Even when the lines start to look like feminist memes from Twitter (the first line in the film is "Women can do anything!"), and the script forgets about logic and accumulates plot twists.
Despite all its caution, "Charlie's Angels" is a successful attempt to modernize the classic franchise and is definitely one of the best relaunches of this year. Elizabeth Banks is not doing anything revolutionary, but she has turned out to be quite a pleasant and dynamic comedy action. Perhaps a week after the review, you won't remember what the antagonist wanted and why the protagonists ended up in Istanbul, but let's be honest - half of the plot moves from Fast and Furious (or even Bond!) It's also impossible to remember.
Promising FIFA 20 Players
Georgy Tsitaishvili (19 years old, winger, Dynamo)
Rating: 68
Potential 85
Increase: +17
Georgy Tsitaishvili made his debut for Dynamo last season, and is now on the list of the closest Kiev substitutes. Tsitaishvili is remembered for his ability to work with the ball and his willingness to always run in fast breaks, so it's not surprising that in FIFA the winger's strongest features are speed (already 86) and dribbling (76). Georgy's weak leg is rated 4 stars, meaning he won't get lost compared to other fans of beating.
If you buy Tsitaishvili, then immediately in the first season of his career, while Dynamo is ready to let him go for less than 5000000 euros. Then you will have to pay significantly more.
Andrey Lunin (20 years old, goalkeeper, Real Madrid)
Rating: 76
Potential: 88
Increase: +12
Technically, Andrei Lunin plays in Valladolid, but the rights to him belong to Real Madrid, and if someone has a desire to buy a goalkeeper, you need to contact Real Madrid. However, it is unlikely that Madrid will release the Ukrainian goalkeeper at a low price, it is much more likely to lease Lunin.
Lunin's rating is already 76, and it may grow to 88. With this rating, Andrey will become the strongest in FIFA and have every chance to play in the base of Real Madrid. 1xbet is no ordinary bookmaker. In addition to the interesting odds it offers, it also offers bonuses and many more. Whether it is for sports betting games or various other games, it offers a multitude of promotions. Use
1xbet promo code for registration can be used when registering a new account at 1xBet.com to get the biggest available welcome bonus up to €1950 + 150 free spins on casino and 100% up to €130 on sportsbook.